Unlike other music databases...
- ... it provides truly independent opinions, and from a historical perspective. I am a cultural historian (I teach history of knowledge), not a "fan".
For example, i do not promote all recordings (or films) as masterpieces.
As a matter of fact, i am aware that the vast majority of recordings and films
are just about mediocre and
very few deserve recognition (even fewer deserve your money).
Musicians are often offended by my critiques
and their publicists often complain, but that does not change the merits of
their recordings, and therefore my assessment of those recordings.
(Note of 2010: I find way too many webpages that have obviously been "fine
tuned" according to the desires of the musician. Basically a lot of bios
and reviews on the Web are simply becoming press releases by the musicians
- ... it is not a trick to sell you music. I do not flood your screen with
banners and all sorts of advertising. I know it is very annoying when
you select a page and suddenly an ad pops up on your screen or the page takes
forever to download because it has to connect to the infamous ad server.
My pages on music, cinema, etc have content (often a lot of content).
Advertising is confined to a handful of pages and only to static boxes hosted on my server.
- ... it is written by someone who is relatively competent and unbiased.
I have been writing for more than 30 years. I am the author of twelve books
This website is not a fan site
devoted to one or a few bands, but a comprehensive music database that
already covers more than 7,000 musicians of all musical genres.
- ... it does not provide catch phrases that music labels can use in their marketing campaigns. The vast majority of critics are more interested in getting free promos from labels than in telling their readers the truth, and the best way to get on a label's mailing list is to help publicists sell the label's music.
- ... it is written by only one person (thus the very unimaginative domain name) which means that uniform criteria are applied to all recordings and musicians, whereas most online magazines are written by multiple reviewers (making it difficult to tell what one reviewer's "masterpiece" means for another reviewer)
- ... it exists since the world-wide web was born (it actually existed already in a different on-line format in the 1980s) and its existence does not depend on a business plan to succeed, thus it is likely to exist for as long as i exist
- ... it does not require the "latest version" of this or that browser or the latest version of this or that awful operating system or the latest version of this or that plug-in
- ... last but not least, it is meant to download fast; even on old, cheap, slow machines with old slow modems. I do not assume that everybody has a superfast computer and a high-speed Internet connection. I avoid graphics and animation. I know that you are looking for information and not for a show of my graphic skills. I pack as much information as possible in a page that will be downloaded as fast as possible.
P.S. Why many pages are translated also in Italian and some are only available
in Italian? It is a tribute of sorts to my country of origin.
I wish i could provide translations in other languages too. Unfortunately, it
is really difficult to fit more than two languages on a webpage.
History of Rock
History of Jazz
History of Pop
History of Avantgarde Music
Best albums of all times
Bands of the 2000's
U.S. Bands of the 1990's
non-U.S. Bands of the 1990's
Bands of the 1980's
Bands of the 1970's
Bands of 1965-69
Bands of 1955-65
Masterpieces of Classical Music
Other web archives